Production
http://www.production.periodikos.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.20240016
Production
Research Article

Design of Teaching and Learning Centers: a faculty survey

Eric Alberto Quinaglia; Marco Aurélio de Mesquita

Downloads: 0
Views: 20

Abstract

Paper aims: This research investigates faculty perceptions of the contributions and ideal design of Teaching and Learning Centers (TLCs) to promote Competency-oriented Learning (CoL) in engineering education.

Originality: The study addresses a significant research gap: the limited understanding of TLCs in engineering education, particularly in the Brazilian context, where such centers are still emerging in public higher education. By exploring engineering faculty perspectives, it establishes a baseline framework for implementing TLCs in institutions without existing models.

Research method: A survey-based approach guided by two research questions on TLC contributions and design. A questionnaire was administered to 415 professors at a leading Brazilian engineering school, yielding 67 valid responses (16.1%).

Main findings: The findings highlight challenges in course planning, competency assessment, and teaching practices, including limited alignment with competency goals and weak dialogue between faculty and program coordination. Respondents view TLCs as key to improving teaching methodologies, supporting pedagogical development, and promoting systematic skill assessment. Their effectiveness depends on clear objectives, institutional support, and strategic alignment.

Implications for theory and practice: This study contributes to theoretical discussions on pedagogical support structures and offers practical insights into TLC implementation. It underscores the importance of engaging faculty and students for successful TLC adoption.

Keywords

Engineering education, Teaching Learning Center, Competency-oriented Learning

References

Bell, C. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (2023). Building the field’s knowledge of teaching and learning: Centering the socio-cultural contexts of observation systems to ensure valid score interpretation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, 101278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101278.

Bernardo, M., & Bontà, E. (2023). Teaching and learning centers and coordinated technologies for an effective transition at COVID-19 pandemic time to massive distance learning and online exams. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19(2), 22-29.

Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2019, April 23). Institui as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Engenharia (Resolução CNE/CES/02/2019). Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil.

Care, E., & Luo, R. (2016). Assessment of transversal competencies: policy and practice in the Asia-Pacific region. Paris: UNESCO.

Cruz, L. (2018). The idea of educational development: an historical perspective. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 37(1), 1-9.

Cruz, M. L., Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Groen, P. (2020). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 729-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1671810.

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671-689). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Ellis, D. E., Brown, V. M., & Tse, C. T. (2020). Comprehensive assessment for teaching and learning centres: a field-tested planning model. The International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1786694.

Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2012). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore: ABET.

Fleming, J. K., Caputo, J. L., Spillios, K. E., Mel, A. E., Stenson, M. C., & Johnson, S. L. (2023). Resilient pedagogy: experiences of kinesiology faculty during COVID-19. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(4), 684-693. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00050.2022. PMid:37498550.

Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 152-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414310.

Gillespie, K. J. (2010). Organizational development. In K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen & E. C. Wadsworth (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 379-396). Bolton: Anker Publishing Company.

Grant, K. A., & Arshad, M. A. (2024). Graduate students as partners in academic development: benefits, challenges, and lessons learned. The International Journal for Academic Development, 29(1), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2023.2265885.

Igboanugo, B. I. (2024). Role of gender in teachers’ preparedness to integrate digital technology in chemistry instruction in Nigeria. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(12), 5280-5287. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00768.

Jerez Yàñez, Ó., Aranda Càceres, R., Corvalán Canessa, F., González Rojas, L., & Ramos Torres, A. (2019). A teaching accompaniment and development model: possibilities and challenges for TLC. The International Journal for Academic Development, 24(2), 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1594238.

Kolomitro, K., & Anstey, L. M. (2017). A survey on evaluation practices in teaching and learning centres. The International Journal for Academic Development, 22(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1313162.

Kotorov, I., Krasylnykova, Y., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Mansilla, F., & Broisin, J. (2024). Supporting decision-making for promoting teaching and learning innovation: a multiple case study. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8131.

Leedy, P. D., Ormrod, J. E., & Johnson, L. R. (2014). Practical research: planning and design (360 p.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Marbach-Ad, G., Egan, L., & Thompson, K. (2015). A discipline-based teaching and learning center. New York: Springer Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01652-8.

Martin, J., Owens, A., Bayes, S., Tofari, P., Lynch, C., Brown, N., Mountford, B., & Warne, E. (2025). Understanding supervisory practice and development in the pre-HDR space: an ethogenic approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(2), 500-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2393116.

Messi, N. (2025). A benchmarking study on existing communities of practice in higher education institutions: a comparison between Europe and US. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(1), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2319186.

Miller-Young, J., Poth, C., & Vargas-Madriz, L. (2025). A complexity-informed examination of educational development services of a university’s teaching and learning centre. The International Journal for Academic Development, 30(4), 460-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2023.2286983.

Nadarajah, Y. (2023). From field to theory: rethinking development studies through study tours. Third World Quarterly, 44(7), 1472-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2189581.

Naffi, N., Davidson, A. L., Winer, L., Beatty, B., Germain-Rutherford, A., Diab, R., Focarile, T., Rukavina, D., Hornsby, D., Strickland-Davis, S., Boujaoude, S., Côté, S., Raiche-Savoie, G., Racine, J.-F., Camara, L., De La Haye Duponsel, N., & Kropf, V. (2023). Moving forward after COVID-19: new directions for teaching and course design in Higher Education. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire, 20(2), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2023-v20n2-07.

Nam, J. K., & Dipasupil, S. R. (2019). The status of teaching and learning centers in higher education: an Asian perspective. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 262-265. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.5.3.262-265.

Noone, J., Champieux, R., Taha, A., Gran-Moravec, M., Hatfield, L., Cronin, S., & Shoemaker, R. (2024). Implementing open educational resources: Lessons learned. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 55, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.08.005. PMid:39667891.

Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kotorov, I., Teixeira, A., Mansilla, F., Broisin, J., Alario-Hoyos, C., & Gonzalez Lopez, A. H. (2022). A competency framework for TLIC for the 21st century: anticipating the post-COVID-19 age. Electronics , 11(3), 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030413.

QS Universities. (2023). QS world university rankings: top global universities. Retrieved in 2023, November 23, from https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings

Quinaglia, E. A., & Mesquita, M. A. (2023, June). Project management office and teaching and learning center: a comparative literature review. In International Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 541-553). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47058-5_41.

Quintero, W. R. (2022). Digital competences of the industrial engineer in industry 4.0 a systematic vision. Production, 32, e20220028. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220028.

Reis, A. C. B., Barbalho, S. C. M., & Zanette, A. C. D. (2017). A bibliometric and classification study of Project-based Learning in Engineering Education. Production, 27(spe), e20162258. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.225816.

Schlesselman, L. S. (2020). Perspective from a teaching and learning center during emergency remote teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8), ajpe8142. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8142. PMid:32934391.

Schroeder, C. (2012). Coming in from the margins: faculty development’s emerging organizational development role in institutional change. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

Schumann, D. W., Peters, J., & Olsen, T. (2013). Cocreating value in teaching and learning centers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20043.

Vander Kloet, M. A. (2025). Off the side of the desk: equity work in Canadian teaching and learning centres. The International Journal for Academic Development, 30(3), 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2024.2364709.

Wall, K. (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: UNESCO.
 


Submitted date:
02/19/2024

Accepted date:
01/12/2026

69c442fca9539514b9185ab4 production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections